No being if you have some obscure bit-actor who did nothing but extras work for 35 years who's never been coined an English version of his/her name is what I'm more interested in. What's the rule on that here since it's 'the here and now' that is setting the precedence for this type of entry so wouldn't a person's background be a factor since this is a 'Hong Kong' based directory or would it be Cantonese usage by default no matter what the personality's background?
I've noticed that entries like these are liable to change once a substantial filmography is compiled for such lesser-known performers. At least that way, I suppose one could see whether they were predominantly in 60's/70's mandarin movies, or predominantly in 80's/90's Cantonese movies, predomminantly in Hong Kong, or predominantly in Taiwan, etc. Would this force a simple "count" whereby, kind of as Calros suggests, the language category containing the most films might dictate the romanization of the name?
Right now old Taiwanese films aren't getting any respect over at IMDB so I'm correcting tons of country codes that should be 'Taiwan' that had been labelled 'Hong Kong' and 'Cantonese' because some folks didn't know better
One area of concern I have is the Taiwan/Singapore mix-ups, though there may be others. I recently found one, a film I uploaded stills and info for called BUHDDIST (proper spelling), which is completely filmed and set in Singapore, where the true life events took place, and in which at least a couple of characters make reference to the the place, but the film was listed here as Taiwan (since changed). There's another thread in "Additions and Modifications" concerning a made-for-tv film called SEA EAGLE, which Young Master believes is Singaporean, but Calros believes is from Taiwan. These are instances where even a small set of extraneous screen grabs from the movies featuring prominent locations or architecture or clothing styles or automobiles would come in handy in making a final ID.
but if your familiarity is based on being a film fan only as recent as the 90s
While I'm sure many folks here can date their initiation to Asian cinema to the early 1990's (save perhaps ultra-newbies who've been fans for maybe less than five years), with time, nearly everyone ends up looking further back, and many of us have to adjust our thinking about romanizations accordingly, as someone we knew from a few Cantonese films by one name, is slowly discovered to have a staggeringly higher amount of Mandarin language-films to their credit. But of the crew that's here now—a far more knowledgeable bunch than myself—I've yet to see anyone's cultural preconceptions (of what have you) run rampant over the voices of others.
There are probably a lot of questionable items plaguing some database entries, and surely a lot of them date from the formative years of this site, and the early-growth years after that where it seemed like too many unrestrained contributors were freestyling the inclusion of information without properly vetting some decisions in the forums. I'm not 100% certain, but I think that may have even had something to do with the massive relaunch a few years back, which wiped clean the membership and forced people to re-apply (correct me if I'm wrong, somebody!!!). The questionable stuff seems to happen a lot less now, and with folks like you around, it's good to know there's always more people looking to make sure this place becomes an ideal resource for the future.