Further to the above, herein lies the inadverted perils of assuming outside sources are true and correct...
LETHAL PANTHER 2
http://hkmdb.com/db/movies/view.mhtml?i ... ay_set=eng
...is listed in the database here, and is attributed as a "Hong Kong" movie. Sadly, it is not. It is a Filipino production with imported star Yukari Oshima.
If it's a Filipino film, why is it here in the database? Because the film's producer, Phillip Ko (who set up shop in the Philippines at the turn of the nineties after he fled there on the back of escalating triad-financed filmmaking loans) was a smart cookie -- Chinese credits were applied to the export print, and the film was dubbed into Cantonese. To overseas buyers desparate for product that capitalised on the early nineties HK action movie craze the film, for all intents and purposes,
looked like a Hong Kong movie. It sported Chinese credits and a soundtrack to match -- but it was produced and filmed in Manila, largely with local actors, and originally made available in the Tagalog dialect.
The film's original Tagalog title is MAGKASANGGA SA BATAS. Ko was a smart operator -- his name was known as a former Shaw Brothers and kung fu movie veteran and, though now based in the Philippines, he could sell his "Hong Kong styled" action films to overseas buyers who were none the wiser once the productions had been rejigged to "look" like HK productions, at a fraction of the cost of their HK cousins. Thus...where does this leave us? The majority of Ko's post '91 productions (like the database listed SHOCKING ASIA films -- West German productions financed by Hong Kong backers) are actually Filipino of origin. Do we continue to list them, for posterity, but adjust their Country of Origin listings? Or do we remove them as they are not Hong Kong films, nor co-productions with Hong Kong?
Over to you, guys,
Michael