ID: Furious Slaughter

All requests to identify actors in images.

ID: Furious Slaughter

Postby ewaffle » Tue May 01, 2007 4:40 am

Without the crutch of a cast list matched to character names I am still pretty hopeless on 1970s movies so there are plenty to identify.

http://hkmdb.com/db/movies/images.mhtml?id=5292&display_set=eng
User avatar
ewaffle
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:53 am
Location: Motown, Michigan, USA

Postby MrBooth » Tue May 01, 2007 5:15 am

Added Miu Tin and Got Siu Bo. From the cast list, the country should be changed to Taiwan.
User avatar
MrBooth
HKMDB Immortal
 
Posts: 2076
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 7:40 am
Location: Thailand

Postby Michael Kistner » Wed May 02, 2007 7:31 am

Did many IDs and corrected wrong Lee Keung (is now Chai Hau-Keung)
Michael Kistner
HKMDB Immortal
 
Posts: 4224
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 7:11 am
Location: Germany

Postby MrBooth » Wed May 02, 2007 7:37 am

Do you agree it's clearly a Taiwanese film?
User avatar
MrBooth
HKMDB Immortal
 
Posts: 2076
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 7:40 am
Location: Thailand

Postby Michael Kistner » Wed May 02, 2007 8:15 am

The movie was made in Taiwan with Taiwanese cast and crew.
But I don't know if the production company First Films is from HK or Taiwan. The company made movies in Taiwan, but they have "Hong Kong" in their logo.
Michael Kistner
HKMDB Immortal
 
Posts: 4224
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 7:11 am
Location: Germany

Postby MrBooth » Fri May 04, 2007 4:27 am

Michael Kistner wrote:The company made movies in Taiwan, but they have "Hong Kong" in their logo.


Heh, can't argue with that :wink:
User avatar
MrBooth
HKMDB Immortal
 
Posts: 2076
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 7:40 am
Location: Thailand

Postby calros » Fri May 04, 2007 4:24 pm

At first I thought "Hong Kong" in the logo meant the company was from HK, but later I found that MOST Taiwanese film companies had "Hong Kong" in its logo. :shock:

Incredible but true.
User avatar
calros
HKMDB Immortal
 
Posts: 9305
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 8:04 pm
Location: Barcelona,Spain

Holding Companies

Postby kenichiku » Fri May 04, 2007 8:44 pm

From what I know about this, most of the Taiwanese output all had to register their charters in HK if they wanted HK (& beyond) to be the port of call for launch distribution as they didn't and still don't have that kind of distribution muscle at home (esp. before state sponsorship) besides, the HK charters allowed for Taiwanese companies to favorably cloak/shelter their arbitrage profits away from Taiwan as their homeland has a more restrictive tariff system for sheltering funds (think Japan's Toyota of America, France's Canal+Group Netherlands, Microsoft UK, etc). When smaller Indies attached themselves to a larger studio like GH or SB, they faced a 'Catch 22' of having a larger 'umbrella' to put the word out for their films and help shelter their profits while at the same time allow the majors to take the lion's share of the cut (& therefore brand the titles easier for you guys to ID) but when it's a short-lived one hit venture, the HK 'company' for some upstart Taiwan producer was usually some tiny 12 square meter office with a desk & a phone in some Kowloon basement on Nathan next to a hawker's stand, rented short term like for 3-6 months during the distribution life of the film.

Whenever I come across such ambiguities while editing, it's the staff, producer & production values that usually tip me off. Whenever I'm in doubt for these types of titles that I'm mopping up over at the IMDB, you'll see that I include both territories i.e. HK/Taiwan as to a title's origin.
kenichiku
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 11:29 am
Location: San Francisco, Ca USA

Postby MrBooth » Sat May 05, 2007 4:55 am

Ok, I guess you _can_ argue with that ;-)
User avatar
MrBooth
HKMDB Immortal
 
Posts: 2076
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 7:40 am
Location: Thailand

Debatable?

Postby kenichiku » Wed May 23, 2007 9:58 pm

Ok, I guess you _can_ argue with that

Sure erh, which part (or all of it)?
kenichiku
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 11:29 am
Location: San Francisco, Ca USA

Re: Debatable?

Postby MrBooth » Sat May 26, 2007 11:16 pm

kenichiku wrote:
Ok, I guess you _can_ argue with that

Sure erh, which part (or all of it)?


Umm, re-read from top - you and Calros did convincingly argue with the thing I previously claimed could not be argued with, so I amended my statement :wink:
User avatar
MrBooth
HKMDB Immortal
 
Posts: 2076
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 7:40 am
Location: Thailand


Return to Actor Identification

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests